[Bell Historians] Early rings of eight

Richard Smith richard at ex-parrot.com
Sat Mar 13 19:54:40 GMT 2021

Matthew Higby via Bell-historians wrote:

> From memory - Derby are not all original. One of the bells was replaced with
> a different bell of a similar vintage to the rest. I'm not sure if that
> actually matters.

Thanks.  It's interesting, but not actually relevant for my 
purpose.  What interests me is that they became a ten in 
1677-8, seemingly the result of a 6-to-10 augmentation.


More information about the Bell-historians mailing list