[Bell Historians] Highest Ring of Bells Without a Lift

Mike Chester mikechester at hotmail.com
Wed Feb 23 20:53:34 GMT 2022


I am looking at rings of bells and their height above the ground.

Please can we stick to that. I have to give a national broadcaster and answer.

Thank you.

Mike
________________________________
From: Bell-historians <bell-historians-bounces at lists.ringingworld.co.uk> on behalf of mail.james.white at gmail.com <mail.james.white at gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 8:31:13 PM
To: 'Bell Historians Mailing List' <bell-historians at lists.ringingworld.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Highest Ring of Bells Without a Lift

>> The Elizabeth tower is 316 feet tall according to Wikipedia, and  the
climb from ground
>> level to the belfry is 334 steps - half as many again as Durham.  It's
nearly 60 years since
>> I climbed them but I don't remember them as being small compared to what
I was used to in bell towers.

I think part of the work recently done was to install a lift, so I have
heard.

James



_______________________________________________
Bell-historians mailing list
Bell-historians at lists.ringingworld.co.uk
https://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/listinfo/bell-historians
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20220223/b8f21355/attachment.htm>


More information about the Bell-historians mailing list