[Bell Historians] Old frame at great st mary's cambridge

[Gareth Davies]

Just a minor clarification on RAS’s email. There is little doubt that the Seage’s apparatus was fixed to bells 2-9. Correspondence between Taylor’s and the church in 1911 confirms that they were going to re-fix it to those bells after re-hanging work.

Gareth


> On 27 Jan 2024, at 22:57, c.j.pickford--- via Bell-historians <bell-historians at lists.ringingworld.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> Sorry you hadn't seen it before. I dug out the details for Gareth when he was digging in Taylors' archives for stuff on GSM. I imagine it was the ten-bell frame altered - which would explain the siting of the treble, although the others must have been shunted around a bit too to get an extra pit in. 
> 
> Chris Pickford
> Westray, Bowling Green Lane, Knighton, Powys, LD7 1DS
> Tel: 07811-453525
> e-mail: pickford5040 at gmail.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bell-historians <bell-historians-bounces at lists.ringingworld.co.uk> On Behalf Of Richard Smith
> Sent: 27 January 2024 22:46
> To: Bell Historians Mailing List <bell-historians at lists.ringingworld.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Old frame at great st mary's cambridge
> 
> 
> Thanks for posting this, Chris, as I hadn't seen the details of the old frame layout either.
> 
> It's consistent with what I knew.  I'm told by the late Chris Johnson, who rang regularly on them regularly while they were still anticlockwise, that the ringing room used to have a raised platform on the north side from which the back three bells were rung.  You can still see signs of where this must have been if you lift the carpet.
> 
> The bells from the old Seage apparatus were mounted high on the north wall behind the tenors.  It was only fitted on eight bells – accounts vary whether this was 2-9 or 1-8 – but was not in use by the early '50s.
> 
> Chris also said that the northwest corner around the treble was rather cramped, with the tenor and treble ropes falling quite close together.  This frame diagram seems to bear that out, and there must have been a fair amount of rope draw around that corner.  It probably also didn't help that the clock weight shaft was in that corner, though I don't know whether it went through the bell frame or stopped below that level.  The bell chamber floor was entirely replaced during the work in the 1950s, so there's no evidence left there.
> 
> Also interesting to see that the sanctus bell – we now call it the priest's bell – was in the middle of the north wall, and I wonder whether it was in use at all at this time.  So far as I can see, the only rope path down to the church is in the southeast corner of the ringing room.  But perhaps it wasn't used during the early twentieth century.
> 
> After the rehang in the '50s, it was hung on a lever for chiming in the middle of the east side of the bell chamber, again between 10 and 11.  It's now mounted above the clock bells in the southeast corner.  I think I've seen it used once in the 28 years I've been ringing at GSM.  A shame, really, as it's not a bad little bell; I suspect the work of Richard Holdfield or possibly the first Tobias Norris.
> 
> RAS
> 
> 
> 
> c.j.pickford--- via Bell-historians wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Yes, they were anti-clockwise. Here is Paul Taylor’s sketch plan of 
>> the old frame layout, drawn in 1949
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Chris Pickford
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: Bell-historians 
>> <bell-historians-bounces at lists.ringingworld.co.uk> On Behalf Of oliver 
>> Lee via Bell-historians
>> Sent: 27 January 2024 22:11
>> To: Bell-historians at lists.ringingworld.co.uk
>> Cc: oliver Lee <oliverbellringer at outlook.com>
>> Subject: [Bell Historians] Old frame at great st mary’s cambridge
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> According to many old sources there is some suggestion that the pre 
>> 1952 frame orginally anti-clockwise and this is also true of the old 
>> ten at Maidstone ( which where of course recast five years later in 
>> 1957), I have often wondered what their layouts where and weather 
>> there are any  plans of them prior to removal.
>> 
>> I’d be interested to know more
>> 
>> Many thanks
>> 
>> Oliver lees
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bell-historians mailing list
> Bell-historians at lists.ringingworld.co.uk
> https://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/listinfo/bell-historians