[Bell Historians] Peal discrepancy

[Graham John]

Gareth Davies via Bell-historians <bell-historians at lists.ringingworld.co.uk>
wrote:

> Rugby Advertiser, Saturday 25th February 1911, page 5.
>
> So date of peal would have been sat 18th February.
>
> Gareth
>
>
> [image: Screenshot 2026-09-10 at 16.21.02.png]
>

Or based on the Bell News printing logic, this could explain where an
incorrect peal board date came from?

Graham
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20260910/9034f702/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screenshot 2026-09-10 at 16.21.02.png
Type: image/png
Size: 593781 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20260910/9034f702/attachment-0001.png>