[r-t] Extension of TDMMs

[Philip Saddleton]

Richard Smith <richard at ex-parrot.com> wrote at 15:34:15 on Sat, 14 Aug 
2004
>> Does the number of additional possibilities as the stage increases
>> compensate for the much smaller chance of a random occurrence?
>
>Probably not in the sample I investigated.  I found 2065 extensions 
>that covered a single stage and 9 that covered two stages.

I was thinking of a higher parent stage - with more methods, more 
sections and more modes available (not to mention more treble paths), 
how many possibilities are there for Major?

-- 
Regards
Philip
http://www.saddleton.freeuk.com/