[r-t] 40320 Spliced S Major

Alexander Holroyd holroyd at math.ubc.ca
Thu Aug 19 16:36:59 UTC 2004


I see Richard has already supplied a masterful explanation of how it
works!  I have little else to add.

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Richard Smith wrote:

>  As far as I can tell, there
> isn't much logic in which pairs are rung in which order --
> I'm guessing Ander just chose something that happened to
> produce an extent without calls.

Yes.

By the way, if anyone is mad enough to want to ring something like this, I
should point out that the previous composition is not optimised in any way
- I justed wanted to show it's possible.  Hopefully there will be further
refinements soon ...

Ander




More information about the ringing-theory mailing list