[r-t] 40320 Spliced S Major
Alexander Holroyd
holroyd at math.ubc.ca
Thu Aug 19 16:36:59 UTC 2004
I see Richard has already supplied a masterful explanation of how it
works! I have little else to add.
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Richard Smith wrote:
> As far as I can tell, there
> isn't much logic in which pairs are rung in which order --
> I'm guessing Ander just chose something that happened to
> produce an extent without calls.
Yes.
By the way, if anyone is mad enough to want to ring something like this, I
should point out that the previous composition is not optimised in any way
- I justed wanted to show it's possible. Hopefully there will be further
refinements soon ...
Ander
More information about the ringing-theory
mailing list