[r-t] Minor principles

[Philip Saddleton]

Mark Davies <mark at snowtiger.net> wrote at 22:14:05 on Tue, 17 Aug 2004
>I don't mind lots of calls. In your rotation to 34-5-3-34.1, I would 
>think a single 1234 instead of the final 34 notation would give you an 
>S-block which you could perhaps base an extent on. A single every lead 
>means you have the right place notation to complete the block of three 
>rows you need (123465,214365,214356 as you say).

These three rows would then occur in the lead starting 216354 - and the 
three missing from this in 124653 - and those missing from this in 
213456 - which is false against the first lead.

If you want to name it, why not include it in an extent of spliced, and 
ring that in a peal?

-- 
Regards
Philip
http://www.saddleton.freeuk.com/