[SPAM] [r-t] Exceptions to the Extension Rules

Fielding Ian I.Fielding at rbh.nthames.nhs.uk
Tue Nov 2 13:44:44 UTC 2004

Bristol Surprise Major - Royal.

-----Original Message-----
From: Graham John [mailto:graham at changeringing.co.uk]
Sent: 02 November 2004 13:19
To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
Subject: [SPAM] [r-t] Exceptions to the Extension Rules
Importance: Low

Has anyone compiled a list of rung methods which don't conform to the
rules on extension? If not let's compile one - which ones can you think of? 

I'll start with:-

Group 1. Valid extensions with different names

- Glasgow S Major, Clyde S Royal, Strathcylde S Maximus
- Leatherhead S Major, Maximus, Fourteen, Sixteen, Kegworth S Royal

Group 2. Invalid extensions with the same name

- Rutland S Major & Royal?
- London S Minor & Major?


ringing-theory mailing list
ringing-theory at bellringers.net


The information contained in this email may be subject to public disclosure
under the NHS Code of Openness or the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
Unless the information is legally exempt from disclosure, the
confidentiality of this email, and your reply cannot be guaranteed. 

The information and material in this email is intended for the use of the
intended addressee or the person responsible for delivering it to the
intended addressee.  It may contain privileged or confidential information
and/or copyright material. 

If you receive this email by mistake please advise the sender immediately by
using the reply facility in your email software or notify Royal Brompton &
Harefield NHS Trust Help Desk on +44(0) 20 7351 8696 

Communication is not sent through a secure server; Royal Brompton &
Harefield NHS Trust cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy of
outgoing electronic mail.  Any views or opinions expressed are solely those
of the author and do not represent the view of Royal Brompton & Harefield
NHS Trust unless specifically stated.

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list