[r-t] Minor principles (CUG)

[Andrew Tibbetts]

Don't worry Graham, it will revert to its proper name. But the wind-up 
potential was too great to miss...

xyz

ps it's bloody weird in hand!

>From: "Graham John" <graham at changeringing.co.uk>
>Reply-To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
>To: <ringing-theory at bellringers.net>
>Subject: RE: [r-t] Minor principles (MUG)
>Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 21:45:45 -0000
>
>It is good to see that this has now been rung to an extent, but under which
>extension rule can a different name from the Major be justified?
>
>http://www.campanophile.co.uk/show.html?Code=22848
>
>Graham
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net
>[mailto:ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net] On Behalf Of Alexander
>Holroyd
>Sent: 09 September 2004 01:49
>To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
>Subject: Re: [r-t] Minor principles (MUG)
>
>Looks as if we were all trying to make it harder than it needs to be!
>
>720 MUG minor
>%  2 4%  5  6    123456
>-----------------------
>s        -       154263
>       s     -    324615
>    -     -       451236
>-----------------------
>5 part
>hls = 345
>bob = 4
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>ringing-theory mailing list
>ringing-theory at bellringers.net
>http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself with cool new emoticons http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/myemo