[r-t] Re: Major Extents

Andrew Tibbetts ajwxyzt at hotmail.com
Sun Nov 14 08:30:25 UTC 2004

He said 'a fourth handbell ringer they don't like very much', not 'that they 
don't like at all'...


>From: Hayden charles <hcharles at grandsire.co.uk>
>Reply-To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
>To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
>Subject: Re: [r-t] Re: Major Extents
>Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 13:37:03 +0000
>In the interests of scientific enquiry, why don't you volunteer as the 
>fourth person?
>Mark Davies wrote:
>  I still think the only way to test this case is for
>>Messrs Earis, Tibbetts and Pipe to find a fourth handbell ringer they 
>>like very much, and ring the extent on eight plus one plain course. If
>>no-one actually goes and does it, then it'll remain an academic problem 
>>requiring a solution.
>ringing-theory mailing list
>ringing-theory at bellringers.net

It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today! 

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list