[r-t] Non-distinct fragments

[Philip Saddleton]

Graham John <graham at changeringing.co.uk> wrote at 16:34:57 on Sun, 21 
Nov 2004
>If you are talking about a composition which contains a change of 
>method at every half lead and lead end, then I agree that you can only 
>have one method defined per distinct half-lead fragment. But I would 
>define a fragment as a sequence of place notation between calls (or 
>changes of method), so if you included lead length fragments of each 
>method in a composition of half-lead spliced, then I see nothing wrong 
>with claiming that the composition includes all of them.

Something like this?

144 Spliced S Minor (4m)

23456 C
56342 Q
24536 C/K
36452 K/P
25346 P/C
46532 Q
23456

48 Cambridge, Queen Mary; 24 King Edward, Primrose

-- 
Regards
Philip
http://www.saddleton.freeuk.com/