[r-t] A Review of Diary Compositions
I.Fielding at rbh.nthames.nhs.uk
Thu Nov 25 14:19:13 UTC 2004
From: Chris Brown [mailto:cjb at etpl.co.uk]
Sent: 25 November 2004 12:42
To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
Subject: RE: [r-t] A Review of Diary Compositions
Among other commenters, Ian Partridge said on 25 November 2004 11:57
>My personal bug-bears are the inclusion of all those triples methods
noone ever rings, and the comp for Smith's 23. How many people ever
turn up for a peal and think "oh damn, we need an emergency
composition. Smith's 23!".
>Including Beverley AND Surfleet is pointless, Carlisle should be
included instead of one (so that there is an example of every backwork
from the 41). Having Kent AND Oxford TB is similarly pointless. The
surprise minor compositions need reformatting.
>The Grandsire Triples quarters seem a bit crusty to me, and why oh why
is Scientific in there?? A quarter peal of half-lead 8-spliced??
>The whole thing needs redoing. A fresh start I say.
Hang on chaps, I (like I suspect most diary owners) am only a part-time
ringer. I occasionally get invited to bob-call a quarter of something
eg Plain Bob Triples, and sometimes we can find 5 other part timers to
mug up on something like Beverley and/or Surfleet. Having them both is
pointless when you only ever get the chance to ring them once in a blue
Also there are many ringers that can find the difference between Kent
really quite tricky.
And we DO ring some of the triples methods!
I can't help feeling that specialists who want to ring 23 spliced etc
knowledge and experience (and time) to look up their pet schemes
elsewhere, and I am pretty
they will be in the minority of diary owners.
I am not saying the selection in the Diary is perfect, but please don't
the "ordinary ringer" (or even target audience!) when re-planning it.
St Nicholas Hurst, Berkshire.
ringing-theory mailing list
ringing-theory at bellringers.net
The information contained in this email may be subject to public disclosure
under the NHS Code of Openness or the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
Unless the information is legally exempt from disclosure, the
confidentiality of this email, and your reply cannot be guaranteed.
The information and material in this email is intended for the use of the
intended addressee or the person responsible for delivering it to the
intended addressee. It may contain privileged or confidential information
and/or copyright material.
If you receive this email by mistake please advise the sender immediately by
using the reply facility in your email software or notify Royal Brompton &
Harefield NHS Trust Help Desk on +44(0) 20 7351 8696
Communication is not sent through a secure server; Royal Brompton &
Harefield NHS Trust cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy of
outgoing electronic mail. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those
of the author and do not represent the view of Royal Brompton & Harefield
NHS Trust unless specifically stated.
More information about the ringing-theory