[r-t] Hudson stuff

[Philip Saddleton]

Richard Smith <richard at ex-parrot.com> wrote at 12:02:33 on Thu, 16 Sep 
2004
>I don't know exactly what you mean by "worthwhile", but all of the 
>larger subgroups of S_6 (upto conjugation)  can be generated by 
>changes:

But what about S_7? The groups of order 21 (clearly impossible) and 168?
Or M11?

>This leaves [6.04]. Can anyone find an example of this?

-16-1236-1236 lh16 162543

>The group contains a 6-cycle, so a principle seems plausible.

Not without three blows in one place.

-- 
Regards
Philip
http://www.saddleton.freeuk.com/