[r-t] Designed for falseness
Earisp at rsc.org
Fri Apr 15 09:33:19 UTC 2005
"What is the most false method treble dodging major method that can be
produced (with a true plain course)?
What is the most false method that can be used to get a peal length?
What is the most false method yet rung?"
Not sure really - I'm sure Richard Smith or PABS will be able to answer
If anyone knows about dubious treble-dodging major methods though, it's
Derek Sibson. I think he had a lot of difficulties in finding a peal
composition for Jesus College Surprise Major
(&3-5.6.5-2.36.4-2.3-36.4.3, 2 (f) ABDLOUcd). This method was first
rung in PABS' 23-spliced composition described on
As a couple of new examples with lots of groups, the untitled method
&34-3.6-188.8.131.52.347-3.6-36.5 (mx) has ABCDFIKLR falseness. Similarly,
the mx method 3456-184.108.40.206-3.2.34-3.6-36.5 has ABDEPRUa falseness. I
imagine getting a peal composition of either of these two methods would
be somewhat tricky. I'm sure others can come up with some better
This communication (including any attachments) is intended for the use of the addressee only and may contain confidential, privileged or copyright material. It may not be relied upon or disclosed to any other person without the consent of the RSC. If you have received it in error, please contact us immediately. Any advice given by the RSC has been carefully formulated but is necessarily based on the information available, and the RSC cannot be held responsible for accuracy or completeness. In this respect, the RSC owes no duty of care and shall not be liable for any resulting damage or loss. The RSC acknowledges that a disclaimer cannot restrict liability at law for personal injury or death arising through a finding of negligence. The RSC does not warrant that its emails or attachments are Virus-free: Please rely on your own screening.
More information about the ringing-theory