[r-t] Re: What's the meaning of a method having aparticularfalsecourse head
Graham John
Graham at changeringing.co.uk
Sat Apr 23 14:05:33 UTC 2005
OK, on rereading my last message, I can see that John Leary's statement does
not clarify the question, and the converse argument for the others is that
Group A is omitted by convention because it is the trivial case.
In which case I would just ask that Richard and Philip stick to the
convention.
Graham
More information about the ringing-theory
mailing list