[r-t] Re: What's the meaning of a method having aparticularfalsecourse head

Graham John Graham at changeringing.co.uk
Sat Apr 23 14:05:33 UTC 2005


OK, on rereading my last message, I can see that John Leary's statement does
not clarify the question, and the converse argument for the others is that
Group A is omitted by convention because it is the trivial case. 

In which case I would just ask that Richard and Philip stick to the
convention.

Graham






More information about the ringing-theory mailing list