[r-t] Larissa Delight Royal
Philip Earis
pje24 at cantab.net
Wed Dec 14 02:02:21 UTC 2005
David Hull's been busy with another new royal method:
http://www.campanophile.co.uk/show.html?Code=33138
Larissa Delight Royal
&3-5.4-5-1-4-5.4-4.7.6-8.9,0 1089674523 AB2c 101 <4-runs>
Larissa is another prize heavyweight method from the Hull stable, weighing
in just over the 100 <4-runs> threshold for a decent treble-dodging royal
method. The overwork takes the neat and recently popular Sussex motif with
a clever inserted '10' change when the treble hunts through 4-5. Coupled
with the underwork, this allows the runs off both front and back to be
distibuted well throughout the course.
The underwork is basically just Triton: the characteristic coursing fours
reversed and consequent 7890s and 5432s off the front giving some variety to
the music. And so, unsurprisingly, the method has the Hull/MBD signature of
regular half-lead-ends, meaning backrounds comes up at handstroke.
Due to the peculiarities of royal, the method when rung with a 12 leadend
change would have a three-lead plain course. To counteract this a 10 leadend
is used, though this obviously means the method has four consecutive blows
in 10ths around the leadend. Far be it from me to offer an opinion about
methods having more than two consecutive blows.
In conclusion this is a very pleasant method, though consisting as it does
of a familiar underwork bolted onto a new overwork, this is not
groundbreaking. Larissa's similarities to other recently rung methods which
can easily be seen. The overwork is almost the same as MBD's "Red Dressing
Gown Delight Royal", though this is less subtle around the half-lead:
&3-5.4-5-1-4-458-4-7.6-78.9,2 1648203957 AB2D2c 102 <4-runs>
It also bears more than a slight resemblance to the slightly older MBD
method "Jennie's Endeavour Surprise Royal", which packs in slightly more
music, albeit at the expense of somewhat messy contiguous places:
&3-5.4-5-3-3478-58-6-7.6-8.9,2 1426385079 AB2c 108 <4-runs> Jennie's
Endeavour
As an aside, in a message to the ringing-chat mailing list at six minutes
past midnight on Monday 2 June, 2003 (shortly after the Dressing Gown peal
had been published on Campanophile), I asked why they hadn't rung the more
elegant published but unrung MBD method "Robin Surprise" instead:
&3-5.4-5-8-7.4.5.6-6.7-6-9,2 1426385079 AB2cd 101 <4-runs>
Jennie Town quickly replied, "Because we are saving that for the next
attempt of course (name already chosen)".
What became of that peal?
More information about the ringing-theory
mailing list