[r-t] Re: New method review - part I

[Stephen Penney]

PJE: "this offering rapidly descends into a series of pointless double-
changes and unneccessary random notations merely to produce a new 
method name."

To me it looks like a method built somewhat randomly around a pivot-
bell. 

"The band should realise that some reasonable methods have been rung 
before"

Maybe they do, but as you said they probably wanted to ring a new 
method, probably for the name. Are you against this practice in 
general? If not, would you care to suggest some guidelines to follow 
when producing a new TD method?

Percy