[r-t] Re: Decisions

[Fielding Ian]

I don't see why not - its as good a way to extend as other routes (in some
cases).

-----Original Message-----
From: Robin Woolley [mailto:robin at robinw.org.uk]
Sent: 11 January 2005 13:44
To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
Subject: [r-t] Re: Decisions


pabs says "What's wrong with x1x1x1x2x7?"

On first reflection, nothing. (I plead being incompletely taught!)

In an identical vein, I seem to have missed out 'SHI below' in the Anglia
discussion. However, even though it has dodging in the 9-0 section, it does
not give any pb lead end methods.

Be that as it may, it does not change the conclusions that the two Anglia
methods are not related and that Anglia Alliance Maximus is not
contractible. (Does it?)

Best wishes
Robin.

PS: Glint - I take the point abt. Lincolnshire, Swindon, Vercellis, etc.
also but I am not suggesting for one moment that these should be considered
as recognised paths. It's always interesting to remember where we could have
ended up, tho'.



_______________________________________________
ringing-theory mailing list
ringing-theory at bellringers.net
http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net