[r-t] Methodology

[rchat]

Tony will now add a reference to the letter as part of the notes in the
collection. From this the change of name can be seen. I assume the methods
database will pick this up. However, it may be a good idea if the names are
subsequently re-used that a reference to the letter is given there as well.

Incidentally, his apology to me is because I asked for his opinion as to
whether or 'Hillingdon' was an extension of an existing method, and his
opinion at the time was that it wasn't. Fortunately, I did not have an H
either!

Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net
[mailto:ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net]On Behalf Of Graham John
Sent: 14 May 2005 11:07
To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
Subject: RE: [r-t] Methodology


Philip wrote:

> The distinction ... is in the Decisions at the time that
> the methods were rung.

I thought this might be the reason. It reinforces the need to have alias
names (or at least notes) in the collections (and method database :-).
Further confusion could be caused if these names are subsequently reused.

Graham


_______________________________________________
ringing-theory mailing list
ringing-theory at bellringers.net
http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net