[r-t] Brunel

[Rebecca Cox]

Has anyone looked at Brunel on lower numbers? 

We rang the Cinques in 1998 and enjoyed it very much; it's stedman reconstructed to make it more interesting to ring and have more coursing music (and only two calls are needed, rather than the four or stedman). I have some straighforward compositions of Caters and Cinques but would be interested to know whether a peal of the triples is possible without using calls which make it effectively Stedman. The Doubles is false in the plain course but the bobbed course is true (and identical to Stedman) so it is possible to get some multiextent blocks with plain leads.   

Brunel 
Cinques 1.3.E.1.3.1.3.1.E.3.1.(E) bob 9, single 90E 
Caters  1.3.9.1.3.1.3.1.9.3.1.(9) bob 7, single 789 
Triples 1.3.7.1.3.1.3.1.7.3.1.(7) bob 5, single 567 
Doubles 1.3.5.1.3.1.3.1.5.3.1.(5) bob 3, single 345 

The leads here have been defined to be symmetric, with the calls we used at the lead end.

Tony Cox
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory_bellringers.net/attachments/20051003/8b08033d/attachment-0003.html>