[r-t] Reverse methods

[Don Morrison]

On 8/4/06, Richard Smith <richard at ex-parrot.com> wrote:
> Except with principles, there is no requirement for the
> reverse of a method to be called Reverse <whatever>.

Is the reverse (ouch) of this true? Can I call an abitrary, unrelated
to anything else method "Reverse Bumbershoot", or even "Reverse
Bristol"?


-- 
Don Morrison <dfm at mv.com>
"He played badly but beautifully."    -- Ingmar Bergman, _Autumn Sonata_