[r-t] Minor Principles

[Chris Munday]

The principles that Roddy has kindly put on his web site are only the
ones I found so far which have no 65s at backstroke, out of the total so
far of 141,235. The attachment has the full picture re 65s. Groups as
defined on Roddy's website.

Chris Munday

-----Original Message-----
From: ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net
[mailto:ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net] On Behalf Of Philip
Earis
Sent: 11 August 2006 12:05
To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
Subject: Re: [r-t] Minor Principles

All good stuff - many thanks. Some detailed analysis would be good -
RAS?

It would indeed be a great challenge to ring a peal of 7 of these
extents. Sadly people are very conservative in their tastes, and even
when they do want to push themselves it is with conventional things,
almost invariably palindromic-symmetry regular-lead-head treble-dodging
methods with no more than two consecutive blows, and no places made in
n-1.



-----Original Message-----
From: Roddy Horton [mailto:roddy.horton at blueyonder.co.uk] 
Sent: 10 August 2006 19:05
To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
Subject: Re: [r-t] Minor Principles

Further to my post on Tuesday, I have now uploaded some 2329 minor 
principles with 720 rows in the plain course onto

 http://www.rrh.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/minor_principles.html

Chris tells me that none of these contain 65's at backstroke - I have
not 
checked this or proved any of them.

I wonder who will be the first to ring a peal of 7 or more of these.

Roddy




_______________________________________________
ringing-theory mailing list
ringing-theory at bellringers.net
http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net



DISCLAIMER:

This communication (including any attachments) is intended for the use
of the addressee only and may contain confidential, privileged or
copyright material. It may not be relied upon or disclosed to any other
person without the consent of the RSC. If you have received it in error,
please contact us immediately. Any advice given by the RSC has been
carefully formulated but is necessarily based on the information
available, and the RSC cannot be held responsible for accuracy or
completeness. In this respect, the RSC owes no duty of care and shall
not be liable for any resulting damage or loss. The RSC acknowledges
that a disclaimer cannot restrict liability at law for personal injury
or death arising through a finding of negligence. The RSC does not
warrant that its emails or attachments are Virus-free: Please rely on
your own screening.

_______________________________________________
ringing-theory mailing list
ringing-theory at bellringers.net
http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Number65s.xls
Type: application/vnd.ms-excel
Size: 17920 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20060814/a6af645e/attachment-0001.xls>