[r-t] Extents of doubles

[Richard Smith]

Richard Smith wrote:

> Alexander Holroyd wrote:
>
> > Can we see a list of the 101 2-blow ones?
>
> http://ex-parrot.com/~richard/doubles/extents/principles-2-blows.txt
>
> ... But as I said, this may be incomplete because I might
> have normalised K/O variants such that the 3-blow method is
> chosen in preference to the 2-blow method.

Ok... I *think* only one method is missing because of this:

  34.1.34.1.5.1.34.1.34.1.34.1.34.1.5.1.34.1.5.1.5.1.34.1

RAS