[r-t] Changes to decisions again
ben at benjw.org.uk
Sun Jan 22 11:31:23 UTC 2006
> [Phil's] proposals could permit jump change methods,
> which I believe go beyond change-ringing as we know it.
This is part of the problem. Everyone has different view of where
"change-ringing as we know it" ends, and thus everyone has different views
of what the CC should permit.
> Using 1250 changes instead of 5000 would cover what the majority
> accept as valid quarterpeals too.
Do you have any particular authority to be speaking for 'the majority'?
> ... peal of Spliced Double Cambridge Cyclic and DNCB Major
> which this decision prevents.
Incorrect. The current decision doesn't prevent it, as long as the splicing
is only at the lead-end.
More information about the ringing-theory