[r-t] Change Proposal to CC Decisions

[Iain Scott]

On 6/15/06, Ian Broster <ian at broster.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > *     To reduce the minimum peal length to 5000 for all stages as a
> > logical consequence of allowing peals to contain partial extents
>
> "To increase the minimum peal length to 5040 for all stages"?
>
> (which seems a much more justifiable number and does not preclude ringing
> 5041+ rows with a partial extent)
>

More justifiable if based upon lengths of extents, perhaps; but would
exclude a whole lot of lengths currently considered to be peals.
Decreasing the minimum would at least have the benefit of being
backwardly compatible.
-- 
cheers,
Iain