[r-t] Change Proposal to CC Decisions - on peal lengths

[edward martin]

On 6/20/06, Samuel M. Austin <combineharvestersam at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Has anyone got access to the Ringing World Pg 105, Feb 14th 1930?
>
> There is a letter by H Law James about the length of peals and refers to
> points which we have been discussing

I don't but on another topic:
HLJ had a theory about Stedman Triples that its 'plain course' was in
fact slow sixes and the 'bobs' were quick sixes, thus the 60 of
Doubles is analgeous to the 60 of Grandsire Doubles = P B P B P B
He  conjectured that the Norwich ringers had got thye extension wrong
and  produced a 5040  = Erin with quick sixes as bobs as well as a
5040 of what he termed "Norwich Stedman" or words to that effect When
he tried this on at the next CC Meeting, he was laughed to scorn  This
was the man who piuoneered 7 part peal construction

Must away to pack

bye
mew