[r-t] pure triples
holroyd at math.ubc.ca
Thu Oct 12 16:45:30 UTC 2006
What is the simplest extent of pure triples?
Obviously the meaning of "simplest" is subjective, but what I am driving
at is that the construction should be straightforward, and should not
require an extensive computer or hand search, and it should be
self-evident that it works.
Also, how many fundamentally different extents of pure triples are
popularly known? Not many it would seem...
More information about the ringing-theory