[r-t] in-course 120

[edward martin]

On 10/4/06, Andrew Johnson <andrew_johnson at uk.ibm.com> wrote:

> With a bit of experimentation I came up with
> 3.1.3.5.1.3.5.1.3.5.3.1.3.1.3.5.1.3.5.1.3.5.3.5
>
> which has some nice symmetry.

Very nicely done. I too had a look at Stedman Doubles but failed to
spot the route that you found

mew