[r-t] Crambo - mystery solved(?)

[Alexander Holroyd]

Here is the composition again in case the columns got messed up:

On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Alexander Holroyd wrote:

> Very impressive, Richard.  It _is_ possible on 6 (and I would guess on all 
> higher numbers).  Here is an example (which I think it is safe to say no-one 
> in their right mind would ring).
>
> p = 234.345.234.45.234.345.234.45.234.345.234.5
> - = 234.345.234.45.234.345.23.45.234.345.234.5
>
720:
1234
----
-.2.
.3-.
2..2
.2..
3-3-
----