[r-t] FCH

[Peter Humphrey]

On Saturday 17 March 2007 09:16:46 Robin Woolley wrote:

> The problem of both these articles is this. They were both written at a
> time when (a) singles were banned and (b) split-tenors were not liked, so
> they set out to go directly to in-course tenors together falseness,
> whereas it is easier to develop the thoery in general, and then pick off
> your subset of FCH according to your chosen restrictions. For example, in

So where should one go nowadays who could sort-of follow Hodgson at the 
time, but has not thought much about it since and would like a refresher?

-- 
PRH