[r-t] Proposed definition of a peal

Matthew Frye matthew__100 at hotmail.com
Thu Aug 7 12:50:51 UTC 2008

Richard Smith:
> (And I don't feel that 
> we should beat around the bush with a wooly term like 
> 'unanalysable' or 'unclassifiable' or anything.  If we want 
> to retain any sort of value judgement, let's be open about 
> it.)

> Note the language: the decisions do 
> not say that they are not peals -- I don't believe the CC 
> should have the authority to make such a pronouncement -- 
> merely that they are not recognised.

Not entirely consistent there, saying that they are peals, just not recognised ones sound very much like a wooly term to me.
However you put it, i very much doubt that this system would have any different effect than the current one, things that were on the banned list (which is what it is in all but name) just wouldn't be rung.
Win New York holidays with Kellogg’s & Live Search

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list