[r-t] Anything Goes vs Peals Mean Something

[Graham John]

RAS wrote:

> MBD (and, I think, GACJ, but less so) seems to think it is 
> more important to excluded the worthless things even at the 
> expense of excluding other obscure but interesting things. 
> DFM, IJA and I are, I think, all of the opinion that you 
> should exclude very little at all, and certainly not if it 
> risks excluding something that is potentially interesting or 
> worthwhile.

I am happy to exclude things which are not allowed under the current
definitions which in practice add little value and would otherwise prevent
us from getting a simple and pure definition of things like truth.

Graham