[r-t] Anything Goes vs Peals Mean Something

Mark Davies mark at snowtiger.net
Sun Aug 10 22:26:37 UTC 2008

RAS writes,

> Your proposal doesn't curtail what we can ring: it simply requires us to
> use a contrived description.  That has to be a bad thing.

No it doesn't - absolutely not. Nothing to stop it being described as one
thing and proved as another. The proof step just verifies that what is
described isn't actually a load of old false bollocks.

Simple example: a peal containing Singles and Triples. All fine if it proves
at the Triples stage. The description of the peal would list both Singles 
and Triples methods.


More information about the ringing-theory mailing list