[r-t] How much of a method do you need to include? (was Proof

[Richard Smith]

Iain Anderson wrote:

> Doesn't the fact that people could ring "short" peals 
> somehow devalue the meaning of a peal?

And doesn't the fact that people could ring Dexter's No.2 
variation somehow devalue the meaning of a peal for those 
who have rung Noonan's, or Slack's two-part, or Carter's Odd 
Bob or Burbidge's No.2?

RAS