[r-t] How much of a method do you need to include? (was Proof
richard at ex-parrot.com
Mon Aug 11 11:09:24 UTC 2008
Iain Anderson wrote:
> Doesn't the fact that people could ring "short" peals
> somehow devalue the meaning of a peal?
And doesn't the fact that people could ring Dexter's No.2
variation somehow devalue the meaning of a peal for those
who have rung Noonan's, or Slack's two-part, or Carter's Odd
Bob or Burbidge's No.2?
More information about the ringing-theory