[r-t] Pealbase

[Alexander Holroyd]

Fascinating though all this is, hasn't it got a little off-topic for r-t?

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Ben Willetts wrote:

> Andrew Craddock:
>> Treats them same as handbell peals.
>
> So for handbell peals, does Pealbase specifically record the bells each
> ringer rings?  (Perhaps it does this for tower bell peals as well.)
>
> What happens if, like Peter Hayward, a ringer has two non-consecutive bells?
>
> And towerbell peals where there are two people on the same bell?
>
> (Not trying to pick arguments or anything; just wondering how your database
> copes with extreme cases, with a view to getting good ideas on how to make
> my own ringing database do the same.)
>
> Ben
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>