[r-t] New Grandsire [was Old methods]

edward martin edward.w.martin at gmail.com
Wed Jul 23 12:15:10 UTC 2008

Very very true Don, in fact when the CC was hard at work defining what it
termed 'Legitimate Methods'  it was pointede out (by a Mr Fright! - I kid
you not, it's all there in the book) that by their definitions, Stedman's
Principle was illegitimate The President Sir Arthur P Heyward stepped in and
saved the day


2008/7/23 Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>:

> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:47 AM, edward martin
> <edward.w.martin at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Ben raised the question that implies that for a method to be acceptible,
> it
> > should be a requirement that the extent of a method can be set out in so
> > many mutually exclusive plain courses.This  would straightway exclude
> most
> > if not all methods where the Treble is treble bob hunting.
> It would also rule out Stedman Triples, which I'm pretty sure is even
> dearer to your heart than New Grandsire.
> --
> Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
> "For your convenience we recommend courteous, efficient self-service."
>                                                -- sign in a supermarket
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20080723/1bc9f6bd/attachment-0004.html>

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list