[r-t] Methods with unusual falseness and beautiful symmetry

[Don Morrison]

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Philip Earis <pje24 at cantab.net> wrote:
> The method is b &-56.5.6.5.56-1-34.4.3.4.34-7,2 (44 <4-runs> in the plain
> course)
preceded by
> However, I've just stumbled accross a very neat and musical treble-dodging
> major method that has only U falsness (and none other).

Surely this can't be right. Don't those x56, 56x, x34 and 34x bits
give 'a' falseness, too?

Or am I missing something?


-- 
Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
"There are so few notes but so many implications."
        -- Leon Fleisher in _The New Yorker_, 19 April 2004