[r-t] Ben Constant's Yorkshire Royal

Fielding Ian I.Fielding at rbht.nhs.uk
Wed Jan 14 15:43:50 UTC 2009


I seem to remember that a string of calls was attached to turn the
composition into a round block after coming into 52436 at the middle -
(HWH I think). Although that made the compositions false it enabled
proof that the composition by A Tyler could be described as a reversal
of Brian Price's.

Ian Fielding

Chief Technician - Pharmacy Patient Services Manager

0207 352 8121 x 4591

07872 995464 (Mobile)

Bleep 7415

-----Original Message-----
From: ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net
[mailto:ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net] On Behalf Of Don
Morrison
Sent: 14 January 2009 15:32
To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
Subject: Re: [r-t] Ben Constant's Yorkshire Royal

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Mark Davies <mark at snowtiger.net>
wrote:
>> How do you handle the case of the amusing 5,090 of Cambridge that was
the
>> subject of extended discussion in the RW some years ago
>
> Remind me of that one again?
>
> With compositions round at the snap you can argue that there is no
symmetry,
> at the level of the lead anyway. However in practice such compositions
can
> often be viewed as false round-blocks, where the first incidence of
> falseness is rounds at the snap, and hence rotation and reflections
can be
> applied. Is that what happened here?

Yes. Though possibly not the first instance of falseness being at the
snap -- it may be that there was a single added or substituted to
bring it round before the falseness occurred.

In any case, it would seem difficult to extend the invariant under
rotations and reversals case to this unambiguously, when no one has
actually written down the entire block that is being rotated or
reversed. Perhaps as a worst case, I can imagine instances existing
where the false, parent block is more than twice as long as the peal,
and the two competing compositions don't even share any of the bits of
calling that are preserved.



--
Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
"Practice doesn't make perfect, nor is it supposed to.  Practice is
about increasing your repertoire of ways to recover from your
mistakes."                                          -- Joann C Gutin

_______________________________________________
ringing-theory mailing list
ringing-theory at bellringers.net
http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net




DISCLAIMER:

The information contained in this email may be subject to public disclosure under the NHS Code of Openness or the Freedom of Information Act 2000.  Unless the information is legally exempt from disclosure, the confidentiality of this email, and your reply cannot be guaranteed.

The information and material in this email is intended for the use of the intended addressee or the person responsible for delivering it to the intended addressee.  It may contain privileged or confidential information and/or copyright material.

If you receive this email by mistake please advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility in your email software or notify Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust Help Desk on +44(0) 20 7351 8696

Communication is not sent through a secure server; Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy of outgoing electronic mail.  Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not represent the view of Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust unless specifically stated.




More information about the ringing-theory mailing list