[r-t] Proportion of Surprise Methods

[Richard Smith]

Don Morrison wrote:

> Eh? I guess I haven't been paying sufficient attention. Can someone
> explain? If "are made adjacent to the treble's path" means "all such
> places are adjacent" this means Yorkshire isn't a surprise method.

This is correct.  Phil Earis' view is that Yorkshire should 
not be a surprise method.  And, whilst I'm not sure I agree 
with him, I can see a lot of logic in that position -- more 
so that I can see in the CC's definition of surprise, 
delight and treble bob.

RAS