[r-t] Carter's Odd Bob

edward martin edward.w.martin at gmail.com
Mon Nov 23 11:46:27 UTC 2009


2009/11/23 Samuel M. Austin <combineharvestersam at hotmail.com>:
> What is the difference between the 1898 and 1902 versions? The one that
> seems to be the generally accepted one is number 39 in the Stedman
> collection http://www.ringing.info/stedman.pdf
>
> Aye
>
> Sam
>

Other than in choice of notation, I don't see any difference/ But they
are different to the Carter's Odd Bob as presented in PABS's
Collection which seems to me to be an arrangement which modifies the
singled in block and brings it to the beginning.
The original went:
231456
426315  ACC
536421 (CDC)*3
132654  BCD
425316  CGE
314256 (FEE)*4
415632  FHD
354621  (CCD)*3
256143  BDC
342516  CCA
231456  (ADA)*4

>From 123456
A = 2  6  10  12  14 for 643125
B = 2 4 5 6 10 12 14 for 543216
C = 2 4 5 6 8 9 10 12 14 for 534126
D = 2  6 8 9 10 12 14 for 634215

E = 1 3 5 7 11 for 264253
fF= 1 3 5 7 8 9 11 for 514623

G has 16 sixes called 2 4 5 6 8  s9  13
H has 12 sixes called 1 3 5  s7 8 10 12

Eddie Martin




More information about the ringing-theory mailing list