[r-t] Carter's Odd Bob
edward martin
edward.w.martin at gmail.com
Mon Nov 23 11:46:27 UTC 2009
2009/11/23 Samuel M. Austin <combineharvestersam at hotmail.com>:
> What is the difference between the 1898 and 1902 versions? The one that
> seems to be the generally accepted one is number 39 in the Stedman
> collection http://www.ringing.info/stedman.pdf
>
> Aye
>
> Sam
>
Other than in choice of notation, I don't see any difference/ But they
are different to the Carter's Odd Bob as presented in PABS's
Collection which seems to me to be an arrangement which modifies the
singled in block and brings it to the beginning.
The original went:
231456
426315 ACC
536421 (CDC)*3
132654 BCD
425316 CGE
314256 (FEE)*4
415632 FHD
354621 (CCD)*3
256143 BDC
342516 CCA
231456 (ADA)*4
>From 123456
A = 2 6 10 12 14 for 643125
B = 2 4 5 6 10 12 14 for 543216
C = 2 4 5 6 8 9 10 12 14 for 534126
D = 2 6 8 9 10 12 14 for 634215
E = 1 3 5 7 11 for 264253
fF= 1 3 5 7 8 9 11 for 514623
G has 16 sixes called 2 4 5 6 8 s9 13
H has 12 sixes called 1 3 5 s7 8 10 12
Eddie Martin
More information about the ringing-theory
mailing list