[r-t] Minimum calls in mx maximus

RODERICK HORTON rrhorton at btinternet.com
Tue Sep 29 08:35:03 UTC 2009


I think my earlier post was suffering from finger dyslexia. It should have been 11 instead of 12.

--- On Tue, 29/9/09, Roddy Horton <rrhorton at btinternet.com> wrote:


From: Roddy Horton <rrhorton at btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: [r-t] Minimum calls in mx maximus
To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
Date: Tuesday, 29 September, 2009, 8:06 AM





10 leads of Orion with a bob in 34 at the end gives a 12part peal of 5280 with 12 calls.
Roddy

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Richard Pullin 
To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net 
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 7:53 AM
Subject: [r-t] Minimum calls in mx maximus

What is the minimum number of calls possible in an Mx maximus method for a peal of at least 5040 changes?
1.) Result without singles?
2.) Result with singles?

I did a little bit of experimentation and came up with a 1 part 5088 with 18 calls:
M W H
- - - 65432
  -   36452
- -   54263
- -   62345
- -   43526
-   - 65324
- 2 - 45236
  - - 23456

Presumably a theme needs to be employed such as the M,W in this composition.
I have also seen an elegant 2 part of Kent, which also uses only 18 calls, by Don.




_______________________________________________
ringing-theory mailing list
ringing-theory at bellringers.net
http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----


_______________________________________________
ringing-theory mailing list
ringing-theory at bellringers.net
http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20090929/6da65f25/attachment-0004.html>


More information about the ringing-theory mailing list