[r-t] Falseness groups

[Don Morrison]

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Simon Humphrey <sh at keystrata.co.uk> wrote:
> This is because, in my terms, groups
> abcdefXYZ have no tenors-together falseness irrespective of whatever the
> plain course coursing order is.

I presume you meant to write "...no tenors-together, in-course
falseness irrespective...".

Is that correct, or am I missing something?



-- 
Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
"That's the great thing about ignorance -- the world is so full
of wonders!"         -- John R Sundman, personal communication