[r-t] surpise minor with triple-dodging treble

[Alexander Holroyd]

On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, Philip Earis wrote:

> If you slightly tweak the notation for the treble's 3-4 section you get 
> a double method, which is more elegant.  Can you get an extent from this 
> also?
>
> &3-3-3-3.4.5-2-5-2.3.4-4-4-4.5

That looks like a big change to the 56 section as well to me (wrong 
hunting instead of right).  I don't know how to get an extent of that.

That the le 2 call does not move to a different course is indeed the 
transgression I was referring to.