[r-t] surpise minor with triple-dodging treble

[Alexander Holroyd]

Nope.  With a 56 hl it is false in the plain course, while the 2nds place 
version has more hunt bells than working bells (actually all hunt bells), 
another no-no.  Regarding the final suggestion, metaphors about ice-bound 
infernos spring to mind... :)

On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, Philip Saddleton wrote:

> However you could ring the method with a 56 half-lead, or splice it with the 
> 2nd's place version, (or wait until the enlightened Methods Committee 
> proposes a change to the Decisions).
>
> Philip
>
> Graham John said  on 10/09/2010 13:11:
>> Ander wrote:
>> 
>>> And a little brain-teaser: why is this illegal under the CC decisions?
>> 
>> Your leadend call of pn12 doesn't meet the CC definition of a call, as it
>> moves to another part of the same course (back to the start of the same 
>> lead
>> in fact).
>> 
>> Graham
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>