[r-t] Spliced Cinques & Max

[Roddy Horton]

I'm surpirsed at you Don. If you rotate then the definitions rotate so the 
tenors are still the tenors but they may not be bells 11 and 12, the same 
for little bells...
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Don Morrison" <dfm at ringing.org>
To: <ringing-theory at bellringers.net>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 10:41 PM
Subject: Re: [r-t] Spliced Cinques & Max


> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Mark Davies <mark at snowtiger.net> wrote:
>>  any good property of a method or composition should be invariant under 
>> rotation
>
> Such as "contains 48 LB5"? Or "contains the entire plain course"? Or
> even "is tenors together"?
>
>
>
> -- 
> Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
> "Interpreters today overshadow those they interpret: tenors and
> actresses and directors are apotheosized, while authors and painters
> are comparatively invisible, with composers at the bottom of the
> heap."                              -- Ned Rorem, _A Ned Rorem Reader_
>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net