[r-t] Spliced

[John Camp]

At 23:56 on 23 September 2010, Stephen Penney wrote:

> MBD: "Basically, any good property of a method or composition should be 
> invariant under rotation. I could mention changes of method. ;-)"

> I have no problem with the changes of method being invariant under rotation,
> but I fail to see why it's a "good property".

I assumed, from the smiley, that MBD was allowing a bee in his bonnet to
buzz.  (The one about how you reckon up changes of method.  If LCL is 2
com, then so is LLC.) I interpreted his remark as meaning that the
*number* of com should be invariant under rotation.  This may well be
how Perce interpreted it as well, but it is clearer when you
specifically state 'number of com'.

But maybe I'm missing something.  I usually do when I venture on to this
list.

JEC