[r-t] Spliced

[John Camp]

At 21:06 on 24 September 2010, Mark Davies wrote:

> GACJ writes,

>> As Don highlighted, there are plenty of properties (including good ones)
>> that vary with rotation.

> Not with the technical definition of "good" I was employing. That is, 
> meaning invariant with rotation. ;-)

The smiley seems to indicate that you realise that you are vanishing up
your own fundament.  Do we now speak of 'rotational' arguments instead
of circular ones?

JEC