[r-t] Crambo theorem revisited

[Alexander Holroyd]

This looks interesting, Eddie.  What properties does it have?

I suspect what Philip wanted was different however: something with all 
changes being single, and alternate rows forming Andrew's thing.  (Like 
Crambo).

However, this will no longer have the 
each-row-once-at-hand-and-once-at-back property, because all th in-course 
rows will occur at the same stroke.

Ander

Philip Earis wrote:

>> +3.1.3.5.1.3.5.1.3.5.3.1.3.1.3.5.1.3.5.1.3.5.3.5
>>
>> My question is, can an in-course 120 also be “cramboed up” to a 240?
>>
>
> Hello
> Do you mean something like:
> 5.123.3.123.5.145.3.345.3.123.5.123.3.123.5.123.3.123.5.345.5.123.3.123.5.123.3.123.5.145.3.345.5.123.3.123.5.123.3.123.5.123.3.345.1.123.3.123
> ( for 51234. Repeat 4 times)
>
> Eddie Martin