[r-t] Double Helix

[Philip Earis]

PABS:
"I'm not sure this will work - the 1458 lead end changes the parity..."

But can't you counter-act this with an appropriate choice of half-lead change?

"...and in any case it would have to be rung variable hunt to get the treble in each position relative to the 3-cycle"

Sure - that could add to the joy.

The fractal approach seems conceptually beautiful to me.  It reminds me of the (unrung) surprise major method I posted about back in May 2005, where each quarter-lead is double, as well as the overall method being double.

f &-34-45-56-2367-34-45-56-7,2
(http://www.bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory_bellringers.net/2005-May/000928.html)

How much beauty is it possible for a method to contain?








DISCLAIMER:

This communication (including any attachments) is intended for the use of the addressee only and may contain confidential, privileged or copyright material. It may not be relied upon or disclosed to any other person without the consent of the RSC. If you have received it in error, please contact us immediately. Any advice given by the RSC has been carefully formulated but is necessarily based on the information available, and the RSC cannot be held responsible for accuracy or completeness. In this respect, the RSC owes no duty of care and shall not be liable for any resulting damage or loss. The RSC acknowledges that a disclaimer cannot restrict liability at law for personal injury or death arising through a finding of negligence. The RSC does not warrant that its emails or attachments are Virus-free: Please rely on your own screening.