[r-t] Touches of Stedman

[Roddy Horton]

My apologies for next explaining properly.

I was indeed looking for touches of the same length and preferably true.

Roddy
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Philip Saddleton" <pabs at cantab.net>
To: <ringing-theory at bellringers.net>
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: [r-t] Touches of Stedman


>I assume Roddy means come round after the same number of rows, which 
>admittedly your example will after 1512.
>
> A slightly less false example is 1.3.8.10 (10) x7 - I'm sure there must be 
> shorter, truer ones.
>
> Philip
>
> Leigh Simpson said  on 08/02/2011 19:23:
>> Trivially, yes:
>>
>> PPPPPP...
>> BBBBBB...
>> SSSSSSS...
>>
>> Any round block with an even-number of sixes should do it, e.g. BBPP 
>> gives
>> 168 Stedman Triples or 216 Stedman Caters (I think).
>>
>> It's not necessarily a bad way to get music - if you can find a common
>> calling which brings up a musical part-end sufficiently quickly...
>>
>> Leigh
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net [mailto:ringing-theory-
>>> bounces at bellringers.net] On Behalf Of Roddy Horton
>>> Sent: 08 February 2011 19:10
>>> To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
>>> Subject: [r-t] Touches of Stedman
>>>
>>> Does anyone know if it is possible to have a touch of Stedman Triples
>> which,
>>> if notated as PPBBPPBBPPPBBP etc, would also come round if rung to
>>> Stedman Caters?
>>>
>>> (I realise this may not be the best way to obtain music but set aside 
>>> that
>> for a
>>> while.)
>>>
>>> Roddy
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net